Reply-To: elfling@egroups.com Message-ID: <37FBA24F.21AEE20D@c...> Date: Wed, 06 Oct 1999 21:26:12 +0200 From: Ales Bican X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: elfling@egroups.com References: <7tcev3$<8s7b@e...> Subject: Re: to be or not to be Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit wrote: > Suilie! > I'm still too curious about the forms of "niye", "to be". **Probably we all are. > > We have naa/ (pl) naar - for both present times **Pl. of _naa_ is actually _nar_ i.e. short _a_. > > nee/neer - for the past simple **Yes, it's said that there's some tradition to use this, but as far as I know it is attested in no Tolkien's manuscripts already published. Again _ner_ not _neer_. > > eane/eaner - for the perfect **Perfect? No it isn't perfect. It is resp. could be the past tense of _ea_ "it is, it exists" > > yeva - for the future **Yes, but it's not as easy as it seems. First it's with the long _e_ i.e. _yeeva_. Second in fact it isn't the future tense of _naa_, but of _ye_ meaning the same. _Ye_ is attrested in Fiiriel's Song, which isn't written in fully mature Quenya. As it seems, _ye_ was completely replaced by _naa_. In Namaarie we don't find _ye_, but _naa_. The problem is with the future tense _yeeva_. Since _ye_ is (probably, we can't be sure) obsoleted by _naa_, as well as _yeeva_ might be, but unfortunately it is the only attested and genuine word by Tolkien. If we don't want to use constructions as *_naava_, *_nauva_, *_nuuva_, we must use _yeeva_. > > And what forms do we have in participle I and participle II? **Who knows? The forms of "to be" are somehow strange in all nature languages. > > Then we have such archaic forms as "ea" - "exists", "it is", "let it > be" **It isn't archaic, I think. Cirion normally used it in his oath. > - and "toi" (they are) **It's actually an independent word for "they", not seeming to be valid in mature Quenya. > . Any other attested? **We also have _nai_ "be it that". Also _uin_, _umin_ "I do not, am not", _uume_ pa.t. of the former. > (You see, I'm asking > 'cause here in Russia's too hard to get Tolkien's books, and surely - > quite a problem to get any of his archives. Are they available on the > Net?) **Ultimately best is Ardalambion. Ales Bican